 |
Chris De Herrera's Windows CE Website |
|---|---|
About |
|
| By Chris De Herrera Copyright 1998-2007 All Rights Reserved A member of the Talksites Family of Websites Windows and
Windows CE are trademarks of
Microsoft All Trademarks are owned |
Palm's
Split - Can they do it?
By Chris De
Herrera, Copyright 2001
Revised 7/30/2001
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
All of these statements are based on my personal ideas about the computer industry. I do not work for Palm nor have I had any financial interest in Palm or done any business with Palm. You must do your own research about Palm to decide for yourself about their decision to split.
The Split - Hardware and Software
Companies
Recently, Palm has been discussing
splitting itself into two different companies - hardware and software.
The idea is that the hardware company would be able to continue to
innovate the hardware without worrying about the(Palm OS software. Also,
the software company would be completely separate from the hardware as
well. I anticipate that splitting the software company out would
allow Palm to work more closely with the other hardware OEMs they have as
well.
Can they Succeed?
Like other companies that came before it, Palm's decision to split
hardware and software has been attempted before. However, none of
the major players that I can think of that exist today has succeeded in
this. Companies like Apple, Novell and Banyan Systems come to mind as ones
that have failed to keep both alive. In the case of Novell and
Banyan Systems, they converted to software only companies and ran on
standard Intel systems.
Apple's Attempt
Think back into the more recent past, and Apple comes to mind with it's attempts at licensing it's OS and allowing 3rd parties to create compatible hardware. In the end, Apple revoked all the hardware and OS licenses and returned to selling both hardware and software. They outlived their experience in splitting, however it was pretty painful to watch.
Profits for Software Licenses?
Are there significant profits in software licenses? I believe that there can be. However, I believe that Palm will still be working closely together to allow their software to run well on their hardware. Heck, Palm will be it's own largest licensee of it's software. So telling me that this will make the other OEMs feel more comfortable does not really cut it. They can't avoid taking to each other to succeed and they've had close relations so I bet there will be lots of informal discussions between the groups. Further, the software's success is closely related to the hardware's sales success as well.
Some Financial Trends (which may not be obvious)
I was interested in comparing some
financial numbers of Palm's that I have not seen in the press anywhere.
I have created a table of their License Expenses for the past 7 quarters
and the Research and Development Costs as well as Palm's hardware sales.
All of these numbers are from their press
releases or their notes of their conversations with analysts.
Note: All Dollars and Unit Sales in Millions. Palm's Fiscal year
ends June 1 of each year.
| Fiscal Quarter | 4Q2001 | 3Q2001 | 2Q2001 | 1Q2001 | 4Q2000 | 3Q2000 | 2Q2000 | 1Q2000 |
| Palm Unit Sales | 0.681 | 2.1 | 2.16 | 1.5 | 1.18 | 0.991 | not disclosed | not disclosed |
| Research & Development | $45.085 | $43.867 | $40.993 | $30.320 | $20.491 | $21.077 | $15.671 | $12.134 |
| License Fees - Primarily from OEMs | $11.6 | $11.2 | $6.7 | $4.6 | $4.4 | $3.0 | $0.5 | not disclosed |
Some Analysis on Unit Sales (based on my own calculations)
So now you can see that the total of the
license fees is approximately $42 million dollars since it's inception.
The total sales of all Palm devices to date as of the end of the Fiscal
4th Quarter 2001 (June 2001) is 16 million with 13.7 million of them being
manufactured by Palm directly. So that leaves 2.3 million units sold
by the OEMs since their inception. Based on the numbers that are
publicly released, the average OEM price over the total existence is
$18.26 per unit. This shows how closely the software company's
success is related to the hardware's sales of Palm as well as the OEMs.
Note: All Dollars and Unit Sales in Millions. Palm's Fiscal year
ends June 1 of each year.
| Fiscal Quarter | 4Q2001 | 3Q2001 | 2Q2001 | 1Q2001 | 4Q2000 | 3Q2000 |
| Palm Unit Sales as disclosed by Palm | 0.681 | 2.1 | 2.16 | 1.5 | 1.18 | 0.991 |
| Estimated License Fees from Palm Hardware as calculated based on OEM average price | $12.435 | $38.346 | $39.442 | $27.39 | $21.547 | $18.096 |
| License Fees primarily from OEMs as disclosed by Palm | $11.6 | $11.2 | $6.7 | $4.6 | $4.4 | $3.0 |
| Estimated Total Fees | $24.035 | $49.546 | $46.142 | $31.99 | $25.947 | $21.0957 |
So you say that looks interesting. It looks like it would be enough to cover the research and development costs. Is there enough to cover the additional costs to run both companies separately with their own Administration, Sales, Support, of of course Research and Development? I can't tell. I don't see lots of room for profits thought there may be more room than meets the eye. The Research and Development costs are NOT broken out by Palm OS versus Hardware. Without this information there is no clear way to see the results of the split. Clearly, there are other costs besides these which must be taken into account.
Palm OS 5.0
On the surface, the Research and Development expense is much higher than
in the prior year. I suspect that the unreleased Palm OS 5.0
development is costing more than prior generations of the Palm OS. I
would expect this since they are switching to the ARM microprocessor type
from the Motorola Dragonball (68000 based) cpu that they have used since
they first started designing devices. Palm has publicly
discussed that they want to make sure that many of the existing
applications will run on the new ARM based systems. This will
require lots of testing. Also, the new designs using the ARM processor
will require the hardware engineers to work closely with the software
engineers to complete this task well. Would a split now delay Palm
OS 5.0? That's another question that only Palm knows.
Conclusion
As an outsider with not financial interest in Palm, I see no clear cut
benefit being presented by Palm to the shareholders for splitting the
company. Clearly, Palm has got to explain why they think splitting
into 2 separate units is profitable today. Further, the relationship
of hardware to software makes the 2 companies very tightly tied together.
I don't see Palm being able to out compete their OEMs in the hardware
space forever. Clearly, Sony among others, has demonstrated it's
ability to create very innovative products based on standard ideas.
They have out done Palm with their latest Clie that has a higher
resolution screen and similar features in my opinion. Handspring
demonstrated the value of using peripherals and Palm has added support for
it. So I don't think the hardware company would survive on it's own
due to these market factors. The big question is whether or not the
software company can survive without the hardware company.
All of these statements are based on my personal ideas about the computer industry. I do not work for Palm nor have I had any financial interest in Palm or done any business with Palm. You must do your own research about Palm to decide for yourself about their decision to split.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]